Nature, it turns out that one hand gives and take the other hand. It seems that it happens with organic food - while the food grown by the use of compost is good for health, it has a positive effect on the environment. The impact on the climate from organic farming is reportedly similar to biodiesel from Palm oil, rap-seed and soya along with ethanol made from wheat, sugarcane development corn. 


In a paper, 'assessment of the efficiency of change in land use', published in Nature (December 12th), researchers said that organic food and biofuels are traditionally very large climate impact compared to farming food. According to them, it is even more and more due to the more areas of the land required for the production of these alternative foods. Clearly, the conclusions alert more health between those who fight against climate change.


In fact, in 2012, Scientists of California published a meta study in the Ensal of Internal Medicine on 237 researchers compared to organic and non-organic food. His findings have shown that there was no evidence that was more nutritious than before. Apart from this, even if there were more pesticides in traditional foods, but they were positive for biological food health.
 The arguments are being kept ahead by organic foods: Chemical fertilizers and pesticides are bad for human health, so it is healthy to consume food without eating. Research shows that 50% more climate effect is compared to traditional peas in the organic peas that is cultivated in Sweden. This difference climbs up to 70% for biological Swedish winter wheat. Scientists claim that "even organic meat and dairy products are also from climate's climate. 

Does it mean that we should abandon the organic food? Because they argue to the more rational use of organic food.

But what about nutrition?  A better approach is to search for nutritious foods, whose cultivation contributes less greenhouse gases to the atmosphere.